Comments on: Tighter Gun Laws?

By: creighton rose

creighton rose — Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:09:12 +0000

ditto to all the great posters before myself-bravo gentlemen! i look @ my firearms as tools and being a fast growing savings account that actually has WORTH unlike our american peso.look at the wonderful swiss firearms laws- every male/female(18-42) in their militia/armed forces is required to keep, maintain and practice with a selective fire full-auto SIG assault rifle (EBR) with 75 rounds issued ammo to hold them for the ride till they can get to nearby armories. kids are taught firearms safety very early on plus you have the option of BUYING(@ a reasonable price) your service arm from the gov AFTER they convert it to semi- auto only status. its cool many families have rifles from generations long past and kept in the family as heirlooms. their firearm crime rate is virtually nil- everyone is safe from dirtbags and and worst dirtbags being from that form of organised crime known as government fat cats- i see no problem at all and we have much bigger challenges to face as one people on this beautiful blue dot we call home…………………..oh and by the way(i’ll say it im the “crazy” person) chemtrails are very real- some peoples situational awareness just really sucks donkey balls. peace to you all, namaste or some other shit like it

By: Mike Tyson

Mike Tyson — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:02:21 +0000

what is the 2nd amendment again? Oh ya, that’s right right to bear arms.

By: Randy Hitchcock

Randy Hitchcock — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:00:09 +0000

The giveaway in this post is the classic liberal response, “with nothing else to control, we must turn to legislation” for the solution. The data indicates that gun control laws, which are far tighter today in the U.S. than ever before, have done virtually nothing to eliminate or reduce the incidence of school shootings or other forms of random gun violence. Guns–like violent videogames–have a way of getting into the hands of those who want them, regardless of “tighter control”. Rather than passing more laws as the standard solution to every societal ill, we might consider prioritizing our efforts, resources, and educational outreach to attack the problems that matter to millions in this country and elsewhere: repression, injustice, discrimination, illness, poverty, ignorance. These afflictions don’t have the immediate, headline-making sizzle of a school shooting (and they’re resistant to the easy path of more legislative “solutions”), but they deserve our attention and efforts far more. That’s the only “no-brainer” in a discussion about more gun control laws.

By: Gordon Amini

Gordon Amini — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:43:36 +0000

If one assumes that under our Constitution, Americans have a basic right to own and possess firearms and other deadly weapons like autos, knives and baseball bats, how do you propose to further “control” guns without trampling on the Constitution? As we should all know, human behavior, in a free society, is essentially uncontrollable Additionally, life is not, and cannot be made to be, risk free. We are always going to have criminals and lunatics, who disregard “controls” to pursue their anti-social ends.

By: James Graham

James Graham — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:45:05 +0000

Dear Emly I don’t know if you ever lived in Germany or not. But I have and I can tell you first hand they have very tight gun control laws. I have never seen a gun kill without a human behind it. It takes someone to load it very time. With 20 you in the army and 3 1/2 in combat as a medic I have seen a lot. It not a issue of gun control but a issue of education, we say if we teach kids about drugs ,sex, sexual harassment and so it will stop it or slow it down. But when we say let teach kids about gun safety we here people scream “HOOOO NOOOOOOOO we can’t”. So tell me why it work’s for drugs, and sex and so on, but not for guns? Also tell me why it’s ok for in 2007 we had 34502 deaths on our roads with 1,794 under the age of 14 vs. 396 gun deaths for under the age of 14. We had 14,539 DWI related fatalities and 1.4 million arrested for DWI. But do not see a call law to stop people with DWI cant by a car. But we want more laws that stop people with no record of crimes to stop buying guns. We have over 20,000 gun laws on the books in the USA. We have vice cop, Norco cops, and traffic cops but gun cops. Every one of these deaths is a lost. Do not get me wrong I do not want to any loss of life. But I do believe we should look at thing from where we can do the greats good have the great’s impact for our money. So new laws are not what need here but enforcement and education of what we have.

By: Dan Howard

Dan Howard — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:23:38 +0000

A while back, Israel had a lot of killings in their schools from terrorists. They responded by arming the teachers. It was amazing how quickly the shootings stopped. There are other solutions besides disarming law abiding citizens.

By: Walter Dixon

Walter Dixon — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:50:05 +0000

I read the article by Emily Holbrook on gun control and find myself disagreeing with her. Tighter controls on guns only limits those law abiding citizens wanting guns. If someone is truly bent on destruction they will get access to a gun anyway they can and that means illegally. Gun control laws will not prevent this.