Author Archives: Adam Jacobson

About Adam Jacobson

Adam Jacobson is a former associate editor of the Risk Management Monitor and Risk Management magazine.
Immediate Vault Immediate Access

Hurricane Laura Damage Could Total Billions

Posted on by

Experts now project damage figures could be in the billions of dollars as a result of last week’s Hurricane Laura, the category 4 storm that hit several Caribbean nations as well as Louisiana and Texas in the United States.

Laura was the strongest hurricane to hit Louisiana since 1856, but the damage may end up costing less than previous storms because it did not hit heavily populated cities. In 2005, Hurricane Katrina caused $160 billion in damages, while 2017’s Hurricane Harvey cost $125 billion.

Karen Clarke & Company estimated on August 28 that the damage will total almost $9 billion in the United States, and $200 million in the Caribbean, where it hit Antigua, Cuba, the Dominican Republic and Hispaniola.

CoreLogic put the damage in Louisiana at $8 billion to $12 billion, and estimated that the damage in Texas would total less than $500 million. Moody’s Analytics also provided a preliminary damage estimate of between $4 billion and $7 billion.

According to Louisiana news site The Advocate, State Farm, which has around 278,000 policies in Louisiana, said it had received more than 7,000 claims as of last week. The National Flood Service said Friday that FEMA had received nearly 100 claims for damage caused by Laura.

On Thursday, Louisiana officials announced that over 230,000 residents still do not have power, and 175,000 have water outages. As of September 3, 21 Louisiana residents have died related to the storm, with the Louisiana Department of Health reporting that at least 8 deaths were from carbon monoxide poisoning related to improper generator use.

In a new report, Hurricane Season: More Than Just Wind and Water, the Insurance Information Institute said that losses from hurricanes have risen sharply over the past 16 years, growing quicker than inflation by almost 7%. Citing Aon director and meteorologist Dan Hartung, the III reported that “2017, 2018 and 2019 represent the largest back-to-back-to-back insured property loss years in U.S. history.”

The Institute blamed these rising costs on populations moving to more hurricane-prone areas like Florida and Texas, and building bigger, more expensive houses in those areas. When these houses—and the expensive property in them—are damaged, the insurance payouts are higher.

Additionally, hurricanes have brought significantly more water inland as climate change intensifies, the report noted. These factors have all caused more flooding and more insured property damage. The Institute said that rising hurricane losses, plus claims related to the COVID-19 pandemic, will likely translate into insurance rates increasing in the near future.

Preventing Paycheck Protection Program Loan Scams

Posted on by

The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent shutdowns have meant perilous times for small businesses across the country, with many shutting down temporarily or even permanently. As part of the U.S. government’s efforts to forestall bankruptcies and layoffs, Congress allocated hundreds of billions of dollars for the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). Small businesses can apply for loans from the U.S. Small Business Association (SBA), which the SBA will forgive if the receiving business meets certain criteria, like “if all of the company’s employees are kept on the payroll for eight weeks and the money from the loan is used to pay for rent, mortgage interest, utilities or payroll.”

The program has helped many businesses, but also left many stranded and desperate when they could not qualify for the loans. According to the Wall Street Journal, as of this week, the government has disbursed “4.6 million loans worth more than $513 billion.” But some businesses were forced to return the funds when they discovered they could not open soon enough to meet the eight-week deadline, and some did not even bother applying because they did not meet the criteria. The program has also faced criticism for not providing enough funds, and when larger and/or publicly traded companies (like restaurant chain Ruth’s Chris) received loans.

As with many other government programs that award payouts and may have confusing or labyrinthine application and approval processes (such as Social Security payments or tax refunds), scammers have targeted desperate businesses trying to access PPP funds. Online identity verification service Social Catfish recently published guidelines for avoiding PPP-related scams that small businesses are facing, including phishing and robocall scams.

As Risk Management recently reported, phishing scams—in which criminals use fraudulent emails to trick users into clicking malicious links or divulging sensitive personal information—have proliferated since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, often specifically targeting pandemic-related concerns. According to Social Catfish, online scammers have been using emails posing as the SBA inviting the recipient to apply for a PPP loan, then installing malware or stealing any information provided. With this information, scammers can then pose as a business to apply for loans or steal funds.

Scammers may also try to contact businesses by phone, either in person or by robocall, asking for confidential information or demanding a fee for their PPP application, even promising faster processing after the payment. Similar to the IRS, the SBA does not call PPP applicants for information, and there are no fees associated with PPP applications. Businesses applying for PPP loans may also encounter fake companies claiming that they facilitate applications, which scammers then use to steal the confidential information victims provide.

 To avoid being scammed, Social Catfish recommended that businesses interested in applying for PPP loans do their due diligence by following the steps below:

  • Don’t pay for a PPP Loan application. The SBA doesn’t require payment to fill out and submit a PPP Loan application. If someone is charging you to fill out an application, chances are its a scam.
  • Don’t give your information in response to any suspicious email, text, or phone call. The SBA will not email you out of the blue to fill out a PPP Loan application. If someone is emailing you out of the blue to fill out an application and to give them your information, chances are they are trying to scam you.
  • Verify the lender before applying for the loan. Only lenders approved by the SBA can administer PPP Loans. To find out if the lender you are applying with is approved to distribute PPP Loans, click here.
  • Don’t click on links in emails. The links in the emails are often filled with viruses and malware that will infect your computer and steal your personal information. They also spoof the application so that you’ll have to give out your personal or business’ confidential information.
  • Don’t reply back to any text or email you don’t know. Replying back to them with your personal or company’s confidential information may lead to you getting scammed. The SBA will not email you encouraging you to apply for the loan, you would have to look for the loan yourself.

Supreme Court Affirms LGBTQ+ Workplace Rights

Posted on by

In a 6-3 decision this week, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that federal anti-discrimination laws cover LGBTQ+ people and that they cannot be legally fired for their sexual orientation and gender identity, ensuring protection under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in the majority opinion that, “An employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex. Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what Title VII forbids.”

The decision was based on two separate cases brought before the Court. In 2013, Aimee Stephens was fired from her job as a funeral home director when she revealed her gender identity to her colleagues. Her former boss testified that he had fired Stephens based on the fact that she was “no longer going to represent himself as a man.” The case was the first before the Supreme Court regarding transgender rights. The second case was that of Gerald Bostock and Donald Zarda, who claimed that they were fired from their jobs as a child welfare services coordinator and a skydiving instructor, respectively, for being gay. Both Stephens and Zarda passed away before seeing their cases decided by the Supreme Court.

According to an April 2020 report from UCLA School of Law’s Williams Institute, 8.1 million LGBT workers age 16 and older live in the United States, and before the Court’s ruling, 3.9 million lived in the 28 states where it was legal to fire someone based on their sexual orientation or gender identity. In 2019, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) brought more than 1,800 charges of LGBT-based workplace sex discrimination. Additionally, a 2017 survey showed that 20% of LGBTQ Americans reported facing discrimination when applying for a job, and 22% were not paid equally or promoted at the same rate as their colleagues who were heterosexual and cisgender. Advocacy organization Out Leadership also reported that, in 2020, “less than 0.3% of Fortune 500 board directors” were openly LGBTQ+.

These factors contribute to workplaces where LGBTQ+ workers do not feel comfortable being themselves, and are more likely to leave, according to Human Rights Campaign (HRC). A 2019 HRC report noted that 46% of LGBTQ+ workers had hidden their sexual preference and/or gender identity at work, and 10% had left jobs because their workplace did not accept LGBTQ+ people.

In the article “The Benefits of Diversity & Inclusion Initiatives,” Risk Management reported that encouraging diversity and inclusion helps all workers and their organizations. Allowing employees to bring their whole selves to the task can be beneficial. As the articled noted, “Often, the outsider believes he or she must bend to the norms of this dominant culture. When this occurs, it mutes creative friction—or creative abrasion, as it is also called—wherein ideas can be challenged productively.” D&I initiatives can encourage employees to more freely innovate and collaborate, can help boost worker retention, and may help minimize the risk of discrimination lawsuits.

But these programs may not be enough to create a working environment that is free of bias and discrimination. Even when companies “fostered an inclusive workplace,” 64% of employees in a 2019 Deloitte survey said that they had experienced or witnessed workplace bias in the past year, and over 50% of LGBT respondents experienced bias at least once a month. Employers can work to address the specific concerns of their LGBT+ workers, including allowing transgender employees to use bathrooms that correspond to their gender identity, regularly updating and reassessing company policies and requiring all employees to review them, and making clear that any form of workplace discrimination is unacceptable and will incur consequences.

Some legal experts worry that workplace discrimination will still take place under the guise of other factors like performance, noting that discrimination based on sexual preference and gender identity is very difficult to prove. The Supreme Court’s decision also left open the possibility that employers could still use a religious exemption to discriminate against LGBTQ+ workers. However, the decision is a critical step forward for LGBTQ+ civil rights and an important moment for workplace diversity and inclusion.

Earth Day 2020: What Does Climate Change Mean for Risk Management?

Posted on by

On Earth Day 2020, risk professionals can reflect on ways to protect both the environment and their businesses. Worldwide, climate change poses countless risks, including increasing the frequency and magnitude of natural disasters, reducing access to resources and disrupting supply chains.

To celebrate Earth Day and help risk management professionals address environmental risks and climate change, here is a roundup of some of our coverage from the past year about these critical topics:

From Risk Management Magazine:

Aligning Sustainability and Risk Management: A collaborative approach between sustainability and ERM can best drive real change.

Taking Action on Climate Change: As the potentially devastating impacts of climate change become clear, risk managers must assess the resulting risk exposures and ­opportunities for their companies.

Insurers Divest from Coal Over Climate Risks: Insurers are pulling coverage and investments related to the mining and use of coal.

Will Climate Change Impact Reinsurance Rates?: As natural disaster losses mount, the reinsurance response could spur action on climate change.

Getting Serious About ESG Risks: Investors are increasingly scrutinizing environmental, social and governance activity.

From the Risk Management Monitor blog:

Venice Sees Near-Record Flooding: The city of Venice, Italy, faced the worst flooding of its famous canals since the devastating floods of 1966, suffering major economic impacts.

Catastrophic Floods More Frequent in 2019: Major flooding has become a normal occurrence for many regions of the country, and by all indications, it is becoming worse each year.

Global Heat Waves Signal Climate Risks: The pattern of dangerous heat waves has become a yearly occurrence across the globe. 

Texas Study Shows Business Impact of Major Storms: The large storms hitting the coast of Texas are having serious impacts on industries across the state and country.

Limit Organizational Exposure During the Polar Vortex: Tips for protecting businesses during the frigid weather phenomenon.