Immediate Vault Immediate Access

RIMS Opening Reception Recap

If you’re here in Boston for the RIMS Annual Conference and Exhibition then I hope you were able to make it over to the opening reception last night.

buy anafranil online thecifhw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/jpg/anafranil.html no prescription pharmacy

Along with great music and entertainment, there was plenty of Boston fare to graze on and hundreds of RIMS members to network with.

buy xtandi online thecifhw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/jpg/xtandi.html no prescription pharmacy

Here are a few pics from the event and don’t forget to check back for continuous updates live from RIMS 2010.

buy renova online thecifhw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/jpg/renova.html no prescription pharmacy

boston4

boston1

boston2

boston5

boston6

boston7

boston8

Contingencies, Transparency and Doing the Right Thing

Against a transparent backdrop fashioned as a giant web page, Willis drew the RIMS 2010 Boston press corps to its booth shortly after the Exhibition Floor opened.

online pharmacy tenormin with best prices today in the USA

The reason? For Don Baily, CEO, Willis North America, and Joe Plumeri, Chairman and CEO of Willis Group, to reiterate their staunch opposition to contingent commissions. But more importantly, they were launching ClientsBeforeContingents.com, a new website dedicated to hosting a 24/7 global conversation about contingencies.

Bailey noted that contingencies amounted to having a “second master” which led to inherent conflicts of interest. But Plumeri put an even finer point on the topic when he attacked the notion that contingencies needed only transparent disclosure to avoid a conflict of interest. “Just because you’re transparent,” Plumeri said,” does that mean it’s okay for you to do these things?”

Plumeri and Bailey’s position on contingencies has not changed in the five years since this became a hot button issue for risk managers and their insurance industry counterparts. but what today’s announcement does is show that Willis is no longer willing to comment on the issue only when it arises in the media.it intends to make this a nonstop topic of conversation to anybody who is willing to listen. And if Willis has its way, there will be plenty more people listening and thinking about this in the near future.

For RIMS, which also opposes contingencies, Willis’ new websites adds a welcome resource to the body of literature and communication on this issue.

online pharmacy solosec with best prices today in the USA

And as Plumeri has shown, he and Willis is not going to let this topic go away any time soon.

“You have to have principles,” Plumeri said. “And in this particular case, these prinicples are not negotiable.

online pharmacy stromectol with best prices today in the USA

Plumeri noted that Willis does charge higher standard commissions to make up for revenue it loses were it to accept contingencies. He went on to say that certain structural problems that lead to possible conflicts of interest — such as the reality that any one insurance company client is likely to be more valued to a broker than any one end consumer of insurance — Plumeri said that so long as the insurance intermediary does its business in a fully transparent way and always does what is in its client’s best interests, those structural problems tend to settle themselves.

Plumeri himself noted that ClientsBeforeContingents.com was unlikely to overturn the New York insurance office’s recent overturning of a ban on contingent fees. Nor was it likely to spur other states to outlaw the practice.

But what he did hope it would do is cut through a widespread public apathy on the topic, fueled by ignorance on how contingences are structured, how they came into being, and what they really mean to the insurance buyer. By providing third party whitepapers, an opportunity for the public to comment, and frequent content updates from Willis itself, Willis is banking on crowdsourcing public opinion on a matter that has failed to find a convincing legislative or regulatory remedy.

“We have a responsibility to do it honestly, fairly and transparently,” Plumeri said of insurance broking. “Because without community there is no insurance, and without insurance there is no community, and I think we have a responsibility to do the right thing.”

You can read more about the website here.

Lawsuit Over NFL “Spygate” Revisited

Carl Mayer is a Jets fan — a season ticket holder who drives from his Princeton, N.J. home to Giants Stadium to watch the gridiron action each season. Mayer was rightfully upset when, during the Jets’ 2007 home opener, the New England Patriots were caught videotaping his team’s signals. So the Jets fan, who works as a lawyer, decided to take action — he sued for $185 million.

“The game will become more and more corrupt if there is no remedy,” said his lawyer, Bruce Afran. “The NFL will degenerate into the WWE (World Wrestling Entertainment).”

Though his original suit was dismissed, he is asking the appeals court to revive it, stating that he hopes to learn the extent of the Patriots’ taping. Taping that brought about a $500,000 fine against Patriots coach Bill Belichick along with the loss of their first-round draft choice. But that punishment, enacted by the NFL, didn’t calm the angry Jets fans. They claim they were literally robbed of fair football games.

In the suit, Afran and Mayer claim that an investigation led by U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pa., revealed that the Patriots’ secret taping went on for seven years.
In their appellate brief, the plaintiffs lawyers said the case was about “a massive, systematic organizational scheme to steal opponents’ signals and cheat ticket-holders of a contest played according to NFL rules.”

In the suit, Afran and Mayer claim that an investigation led by U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pa., revealed that the Patriots’ secret taping went on for seven years.

In their appellate brief, the plaintiffs lawyers said the case was about “a massive, systematic organizational scheme to steal opponents’ signals and cheat ticket-holders of a contest played according to NFL rules.”

The brief said that “such pervasive cheating has consistently given the Patriots an unfair, illegal advantage over its opponents and systematically deprived plaintiffs of the right to witness football matches played fairly as advertised and according to NFL rules, which is what plaintiffs contracted for.”

In the 3rd Circuit Court of appeals yesterday — that was the question: Is the purchase of a Jets ticket the purchase of a contract between fans and the NFL and do consumer protection laws apply? The decision of whether or not this case will make it to trial is expected within two to three months.

What do you think? Is the purchase of a ticket a contract entitling the ticket holder to a fair game?

jets