WEF Spotlights Insurers, Risk Response Network

The annual World Economic Forum (WEF) kicked off yesterday in Davos, Switzerland, welcoming more than 2,500 business leaders, politicians and social activists.

A laundry list of issues awaited those in attendance, from the global economy to Eurozone debt to responsible capitalism to preventing the next financial crisis.

These issues, along with several others, are what prompted the WEF to form the Risk Response Network (RRN), “to better understand, manage and respond to complex, interdependent risk.”  In response to the new RRN, Kevin Steinberg, chief operating officer for the WEF in the United States commented:

“Over the past several years, the world has been very reactive. If you look at the number of crises that have hit from financial to social to economic ones, almost everybody has felt they’ve been trying to avoid falling off the cliff.

One of the moods we’re starting to see here in Davos is the sense we need to be more proactive. We need to think about risk not only in terms of responding to events after the fact but structuring our thinking before, being prepared.”

The RNN will be comprised of risk officers from top corporations, governments and global risk regulating bodies who will draw from the WEF’s own knowledge and insight with the aim of helping decision-makers better understand risks and respond to them proactively. The project also involves WEF-led partnerships that mobilize rapid response teams after disasters.

In other news from Davos, insurers became the topic of conversation when the question was raised as to whether large insurers should be included in a shortlist by regulators “for big players in need of more safeguards to avoid posing a threat to the whole financial system” These “big players” are known as Systemically Important Financial Institutions (SIFIs), and even though it has been said time and time again that insurance companies are not inherently systemic, the questions arises yet again. Needless to say, insurance execs at the WEF resisted being grouped as a SIFI.

“I don’t see any reason to elevate the status of insurers in a way that they are systemic,” said Dieter Wemmer, Chief Financial Officer at Swiss insurer Zurich Financial Services. Sometimes the word systemic is being used very loosely and we should understand what it means.”

‘Round and ’round we go…

Color-Coded Terrorism Alerts Are Being Phased Out

About time, Department of Homeland Security.

buy norvasc online www.delineation.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/jpg/norvasc.html no prescription pharmacy

I’m all for authorities trying to inform citizens about specific threats to public safety, but let’s not treat people like they are in the third grade. Nonspecific, blanket statements about an increased risk just make little sense. And color-coded labels? Works for a stoplight. Not so much for terrorist plots.

Fortunately, government officials have seen the error of their ways.

The officials, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the pending announcement, say the Homeland Security Department will begin a 90-day phasing out of the system on Thursday.

The Homeland Security Department plans to tell the public about a terror threat much like it has been doing for the past few years – through government announcements and the news media.

The five-tiered color-coded terror warnings were created after the Sept.

buy cipro online www.northwestmed.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/jpg/cipro.html no prescription pharmacy

11, 2001, attacks, and they quickly became the butt of late-night talk show jokes.
Online Pharmacy https://galenapharm.com/ no prescription

The government hasn’t made changes in the colored alert levels since 2006, but it has been reviewing its usefulness for more than a year.

You know it’s bad when AP stories are citing “late-night talk show jokes” as a legitimate criticism of how silly the system is. The new system of communicating threats won’t do anything to lower the risk.

buy paxil online www.delineation.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/jpg/paxil.html no prescription pharmacy

But hopefully it will prepare all of us to better understand the world in which we now live.

Toyota’s Troubles Part Two (Or Three or Four or . . .)

Here I am again, writing about Toyota’s troubles.

Today, the car company announced another massive global recall of close to 1.7 million cars due to fuel leak problems. The car models in question affecting the U.S. are the Lexus IS and GS sedans. And though Toyota says it has received no reports of accidents or deaths due to the malfunction, it has had numerous complaints from North American, European and Japanese customers.

It’s been a horrible two years for the world’s largest car manufacturer. Last February I wrote about the Prius recall and the numerous questions that followed regarding buy tamiflu online www.scottsdaleweightloss.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/jpg/tamiflu.html no prescription pharmacy

Think that’s bad? Toyota also demands that their employees never walk around the office with their hands in their pockets.” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>the company’s totalitarian business environment.

The “Toyota Way” is the company’s long-standing philosophy that, among other things, places an extreme emphasis on maximizing efficiency by minimizing waste. Some have even said it acts almost like a religion amongst Toyota’s 316,000 employees. There is even a Toyota-approved way of turning corners when walking around the company’s numerous hallways (you must do say at a 90 degree angle). Think that’s bad? Toyota also demands that their employees never walk around the office with their hands in their pockets.

Now if only they could be that vigilant and careful with their car manufacturing process. Does Toyota value waste-cutting and efficiency more than product quality and customer safety?

It’s a question that has been asked more than once.