Immediate Vault

Safeguarding the World Cup

world cup cape town

For 10 days, the World Cup has been captivating the globe. Widely considered the greatest event in sports, fans have been riveted by the daily matches from South Africa featuring soccer legends like Lionel Messi from Argentina, Cristiano Ronaldo of Portugal and Wayne Rooney of England. But while the players make the “Beautiful Game” look effortless, the preparation to ready the country for this tournament of 32 nations was anything but.

Building stadiums, improving transportation infrastructure and ensuring security took a Herculean effort in a country that escaped Apartheid just 16 years ago and, even today, struggles to overcome societal ills including a 25% unemployment rate, some 50 murders per day and a population where 11% of South Africa’s nearly 50 million citizens live with HIV.

Munich Re, for example, was brought in to aid construction of a new high-speed rail project.

The rail link was planned and approved long before South Africa was awarded the World Cup. However, there is no doubt that the World Cup speeded up the construction project, which was started in 2006.

Munich Re was also involved in the mammoth upgrade of “Soccer City,” the Johannesburg stadium that is the nation’s crown jewel for this year’s World Cup. (See video below for more on the renovation.)

February 2007 saw the beginning of stadium renovation, which was covered by way of a CAR policy. The stadium, renovated at a cost of 300 million pounds and ten million working hours, will host the opening ceremony, the opening game and the tournament final. Its new design takes its inspiration from traditional African pottery and resembles a calabash. The renovation work, completed in October 2009, increased Soccer City’s capacity from 80,000 to 94,000, making it the biggest stadium in Africa.

Additionally, Munich Re insured the construction of at least two other stadiums that were built from the ground up for the World Cup.

Then, of course, comes coverage for the games themselves. In all, some $9 billion in insurance was taken out before the games, most of which covered property, game cancellation, broadcast failure and liability issues.

That’s just for the games themselves. Lloyd’s turned to Chris Nash, an underwriter at Sportscover, for some additional input on the “vast range of potential coverage.” He rattled off a list that includes competitions, offers, prizes, sponsorships, and broadcast rights. “It’s impossible to know how many there are, but all companies with these financial implications need coverage,” he explained. “When you take this into account along with the number of broadcasters around the world airing the games, I’d probably estimate the whole thing at around £3 billion [$4.33 billion].”

What it all comes down to is that, for all companies involved in this year’s World Cup, there is a lot more than goals, trophies and international bragging rights on the line. They stand to make — or lose — millions depending on how the tournament plays out.

The last time the World Cup was canceled was World War II. These days, the business of sports is much bigger, and so are the potential losses.

Between the opening ceremony for the 2010 World Cup on June 11 and the presentation of the trophy a month later, almost 100 hours of live soccer is being broadcast around the world. Soccer federation FIFA earned $2.7 billion in total from the broadcast rights at the 2002 and 2006 World Cups, according to FIFA’s figures.

FIFA said it took out an insurance policy to provide coverage of $650 million in the event of the postponement or relocation of the games. This policy covered acts of terrorism, natural disaster, epidemics, war and accidents. Munich Re’s share of this policy is the largest at $350 million.

And while South Africa, the first country on the continent to host the World Cup, struggles with its reputation as a crime hot spot, crime doesn’t directly affect contingency and liability insurance for the World Cup. Instead, it would have been a concern for fans insuring their trip, according to Emily Hughes, a spokeswoman at Lloyds.
The last time the World Cup was canceled was World War II. These days, the business of sports is much bigger, and so are the potential losses.
Between the opening ceremony for the 2010 World Cup on June 11 and the presentation of the trophy a month later, almost 100 hours of live soccer is being broadcast around the world. Soccer federation FIFA earned $2.7 billion in total from the broadcast rights at the 2002 and 2006 World Cups, according to FIFA’s figures.
FIFA said it took out an insurance policy to provide coverage of $650 million in the event of the postponement or relocation of the games. This policy covered acts of terrorism, natural disaster, epidemics, war and accidents. Munich Re’s share of this policy is the largest at $350 million.

Though the worst threats have been avoided so far, the very first week did provide cause for concern, as striking employees from a private security firm hired to protect a stadium in Cape Town clashed with local law enforcement on June 17.

Police in Cape Town fired a stun grenade and rubber bullets to break up a protest Thursday of more than a hundred private guards who had been hired to provide security at a World Cup soccer stadium.

The clash was the latest incident involving employees of Stallion Security Consortium, whose employees were replaced by police officers at four stadiums around the country after the workers walked off the job in a pay dispute with their employer.

Although the labor dispute hasn’t affected the World Cup games, the incidents highlight simmering tensions in a country where many workers remain poorly paid and unemployment is about 25%. State power company Eskom is in the midst of negotiations to avoid a pay strike that could disrupt electricity supplies. A three-week strike over wages last month paralyzed the country’s ports and freight rail.

Fortunately, security has still largely been maintained throughout the country since the tournament began and the worst fears of many have not been realized, despite this first scare. Let’s hope it is also the last.

A video showing the transformation of Soccer City in Johannesburg into the largest, most iconic stadium in Africa.

Insured Losses from Chilean Earthquake: Update

Last Wednesday I blogged about the Chilean earthquake costing insurers up to $8 billion. That number has since been revised by Swiss Re — the world’s second largest reinsurer claims the impact on the sector would be between $4 and $7 billion.

Swiss Re says “it’s own losses from last month’s 8.8 magnitude earthquake would total about $500 million.” Germany’s Munich Re has said it expects to lose about $543 million from the Chilean disaster.

Analysts said that while the losses were large, they were probably not sufficient to reverse recent falls in the prices reinsurance companies charge insurance firms to cover natural disasters such as earthquakes or hurricanes. “Although it will almost certainly lead to a change in reinsurance prices for business in that region, it is not an industry-changing event on its own,” said Helvea analyst Tim Dawson.

Economic recovery from an earthquake is easier when the affected area’s economy is a strong one. Chile’s successful copper production industry was unaffected by the quake. And even though it’s wine, fish and paper pulp industry took a small hit, it’s overall economic outlook remains strong. That economy is now in the hands of incoming President Sebastian Pinera who takes office today. The billionaire conservative businessman and Harvard-trained economist has a tough job ahead of him but many feel he is well-equipped.

The earthquake that struck Chile on February 27 was not the biggest natural disaster the country has faced. Below is a video of the record-breaking 1960 earthquake that registered 9.5 on the Richter scale, the largest recorded earthquake in history — killing approximately 1,655 and causing $550 million in damage. The ravaging tsunamis that followed caused 61 deaths and $75 million worth of damage in Hawaii. Damage was reported in Japan and the U.S. as well. It is the only earthquake known as an “international disaster.”

Buffett Invests in Munich Re, Boosting Share Price

Munich Re was very happy to recently announce that billionaire Warren Buffett has invested even more money in the company. He now holds a 3.045% stake in the company and news of the investment boosted share price by 2%.

A 30-day view of Munich Re's share price, compared to the 200-day simple moving average.

A 30-day view of Munich Re's share price, compared to the 200-day simple moving average.

In early 2008, Buffett’s investment company, Berkshire Hathaway, bought a 3% stake in Swiss Re. During the U.S. subprime crisis, the company helped rescue Swiss Re from financial trouble with a major loan, helping to strengthen the reinsurance company’s balance sheet.

Berkshire Hathaway itself has reinsurance operations, Berkshire Hathaway Re, which is among the largest three reinsurers worldwide by gross premium income. Buffett has repeatedly said in the past that he isn’t eyeing a takeover of the Swiss company. However, during the past two years, Swiss Re and Berkshire have entered several reinsurance deals, raising speculation that the two firms could merge at some point.

Buffett is no stranger to the reinsurance market. Berkshire Hathaway owns Berkshire Hathaway Re, one of the largest three reinsurers worldwide in terms of gross premium income. Berkshire also owns various other insurance companies, including GEICO, which it acquired in 1996, General Re, which it acquired in 1998, NRG (Nederlandse Reassurantie Groep), which it bought in 2007 and Berkshire Hathaway Assurance, a government bond issuance company.